Featuring in a trial questioning Apple's worth of software updates, iTunes chief current Cue says they were obligatory for the reason that hackers wanted to break apart the company's digital-music ecosystem.
ITunes chief current Cue rebutted claims with the aim of Apple tried to demoralize iPod competitors just about a decade before, maxim Apple was fighting a "never end battle" hostile to hackers to keep its digital media player and popularize its at that time nascent tune commerce.
"Steve was mighty upset with me and the team when on earth we got hacked," Cue, testifying featuring in a class-action grievance hostile to Apple, assumed Thursday featuring in reference to earlier first in command Steve Jobs, who died featuring in 2011. "If a hack happened, we had to remedy with the aim of hack inside a assured period interlude or else they [the past performance labels] would remove all their tune from the deposit."
Apple was in addition difficult to prevent others from infringement the ecosystem it had formed involving its iTunes software, iPod MP3 tune player and iTunes online tune deposit. "All these other guys with the aim of tried the draw near of difficult to befall initiate unsuccessful for the reason that it broke," he assumed. "There's rebuff way pro us to tolerate finished with the aim of and tolerate the winner with the aim of we had."
The class-action suit centers on an antitrust apply for head made featuring in 2005, but since amended completed period, with the aim of alleges Apple kept back iPod prices artificially area of high pressure involving 2006 and 2009 by using iTunes software updates to injure competitors, which Apple considered hackers. By frequently changing its software to ban competing tune food like RealNetworks from allowing their tune to run on consumers' iPods, the plaintiffs argue, Apple broke the law and harmed consumers so it may well assert its dominance featuring in the digital tune marketplace.
Cue is the head high-profile Apple executive to take the standpoint through the trial, which is featuring in its third time and is likely to conclude subsequently week sooner than the jury weighs featuring in. Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller and even Jobs, appearing via capture on tape deposition, are in addition likely to argue with the aim of companies like RealNetworks were reverse-engineering Apple products and exploiting flaws featuring in its classification. Apple says updates -- numbered 7.0 and 7.4 -- to the iTunes software with the aim of powered the iPod were featuring in statement legitimate artifact improvements to the tools.
So far, the date has heard from expert witnesses and Apple executives who tolerate painted the company's measures featuring in contradicting illumination. Ultimately, the jury willpower decide whether Apple's intent featuring in updating iTunes was to keep itself and its past performance label relationships, as a substitute of difficult to purposefully injure competitors. If the self-defense argument doesn't stick up, Apple had a authorized obligation to initiate its products up to competitors pro the benefit of consumers, authorized experts say.
"The plaintiffs featuring in this task are making single of the nearly everyone aggressive arguments with the aim of is to be had featuring in antitrust law -- with the aim of a company can in point of fact tolerate a duty to allow rivals to worth with the aim of company's property," wrote David Olson, an assistant professor by the side of Boston College Law prepare and an antitrust expert, featuring in an email. "Obviously the date cannot amend the earlier period, but if it finds with the aim of Apple did tolerate a duty to deal with rivals and violated it by locking them available, at that time plaintiffs can befall awarded reimbursement up to three time the amount of the injury."
The plaintiffs are asking pro almost $350 million featuring in reimbursement, but with the aim of amount might hop to $1 billion if Apple loses the task.
Cue, who runs Internet software and services pro Apple, coupled the company featuring in 1989 and eventually oversaw the launch of Apple's online deposit featuring in 1998. The iPod, a device with the aim of show business MP3 tune archive, was released featuring in 2001. Cue helped launch Apple's iTunes digital-music deposit featuring in 2003, which presently sold television shows and movies, and the App deposit featuring in 2008 pro cellular phone applications. He led negotiations with the five prevalent past performance labels around 2002 to build available Apple's opening 200,000-song documentation, which became to be had to consumers the subsequently time.
He was in addition to blame pro ensuring with the aim of Apple's digital constitutional rights management (DRM) tool, called FairPlay, was featuring in compliance with the past performance labels and with the aim of it was updated habitually to keep with the aim of connection and secure Apple's classification. FairPlay acts in the same way as a kind of digital watermark with the aim of both lettersrs someplace a hold came from and prevents a digital media put on record from being played featuring in unauthorized ways, such in the same way as on a competing MP3 player.
The plaintiffs apply for with the aim of Apple unfairly used FairPlay to stop available competitors, especially in the same way as past performance labels spoken fascination featuring in expanding clear of iTunes and the iPod to swell digital-music sales.
"The timing of as soon as you made the decision to not suit interoperable was lone as soon as you had a dominant spot featuring in the marketplace," Bonny Sweeney, the pointer plaintiff's lawyer, alleged featuring in date Thursday. In the same way as basic in the same way as 2004, single time later the iTunes deposit launched, Apple controlled 70 percent of all online tune sales.
"No, we planning almost licensing the DRM from the introduction," Cue assumed. "It was single of the things with the aim of we planning was the desirable move and we can develop the marketplace and grow earlier. We couldn't locate a way to perform with the aim of and be it come off reliably."
Apple cites maintenance security and user experience in the same way as reasons it did not license FairPlay. "Microsoft unsuccessful miserably as soon as it tried to perform this," Cue added. "They tried to build a DRM they may well license. It would from time to time come off and from time to time it didn't."
Microsoft by the side of the period had a tune put on record format, WMA, with the aim of competed with the MP3 format Apple was using. Microsoft in addition residential a competing DRM tools with the aim of it openly qualified to third parties. Cue says with the aim of Microsoft and its exponentially bigger marketplace share featuring in PCs intended with the aim of Apple did not tolerate an insurmountable dominance featuring in the marketplace and with the aim of it succeeded lone for the reason that of its strategy. "We stayed our module. We certain again with the aim of come again? We were liability was better," he assumed.
Cue in addition says with the aim of past performance labels, as soon as they head hammered available their contracts with Apple, requested DRM tools. Lone as soon as they revealed with the aim of iTunes was a winner, Cue says, did they set out requesting the opposite. Yet even at that time, the past performance labels still wanted to hamper the ways customers may well worth digital tune archive featuring in a way Apple says it combated.
"We assumed featuring in interoperability, which was DRM-free," Cue assumed. "They [the past performance labels] wanted to tolerate their cake and trouble it too. They wanted to tolerate all the interoperabilities with DRM-free with all the protections of a DRM."
Lone as soon as Amazon, featuring in 2007, began releasing digital tune archive DRM-free through its online deposit did past performance labels set out shifting their strategy, Cue says, though even at that time lone single of the four key labels, EMI, had revealed fascination featuring in experimenting with DRM-free tune by the side of the period. Featuring in 2007, Apple hammered available a connection with particular of the labels to perform clearly with the aim of, calling it iTunes Plus, and by 2009, DRM-free tune had suit standard across all key labels.
Complicating Apple's narrative, however, are allegations with the aim of it misled iPod users completed come again? Its iTunes updates were liability as soon as folks consumers attempted to situate songs sold by other online tune food against their iPods using software like RealNetworks' Harmony. With the aim of software purportedly reverse-engineered Apple's FairPlay tools and practical it to its own songs, tricking the iPod into thinking it was communicating with iTunes.
Apple's response featuring in iTunes 7.0 was to keep informed FairPlay so it would prevent the iPod from in performance one songs when it detected one unauthorized MP3 tune archive. It would at that time force users to reset the device, deleting one songs not purchased from iTunes.
"This is the treatment being worse than the disease," David Martin, a PC software expert, assumed on the standpoint Wednesday. Martin, an expert witness pro the plaintiffs, has testified featuring in 13 trials since 2000 and has served in the same way as a consultant featuring in 17 other instances, according to his resume filed with the date."No topic come again? Bug you're chatting almost, the most awful likely outcome pro the consumer experience is the user not being able to play a part songs."
Users were in no way notified with the aim of Apple was using this method to keep FairPlay, as a substitute they were presented with an fault message with the aim of asked them to reset their iPods, the suit claims. Augustin Farrugia, Apple's be first of DRM security, who spoke Wednesday, assumed the lack of in sequence was an effort not to confuse consumers and was "the top user experience with the aim of we had" for the reason that it would sincere each person affected headed for the same solution.
"It was blocked for the reason that Harmony was reverse-engineered and conjecture come again?, as soon as a in mint condition version [of iTunes] came available it didn't come off," Cue assumed.
As soon as asked whether consumers had an path, even back featuring in 2004, pro introduction competing tune stores' tune against iPods exclusive of being prevented by FairPlay tools, Cue assumed with the aim of from the introduction iTunes had a straightforward and authorized process.
"You may well take the songs you bought featuring in one more deposit," Cue assumed, "and burn them against a disc and at that time speed them back into one device or else tune player you wanted."
Tags: Apple , Digital , Media , ipod
没有评论:
发表评论